Comparison · Launch monitors

FlightScope X3C vs Trackman 4

X3C

FlightScope X3C

Radar + camera · Behind the ball · 17–19 ft deep

$13,495

vs
Trackman 4

Trackman 4

Radar + camera · Behind the ball · 18–19 ft deep

$25,995

The difference that matters

The Trackman 4 measures spin directly, while the FlightScope X3C needs marked balls for it. The Trackman 4 lists more club data (16 parameters against 12). At the prices we observed, the FlightScope X3C costs $12,500 less.

Side by side

SpecificationFlightScope X3CTrackman 4
TrackingRadar + cameraRadar + camera
DetailFusion Tracking (3D Doppler radar plus image processing)Dual radar with integrated camera (Doppler and photometric)
PlacementBehind the ballBehind the ball
Room depth (FOREference)17–19 ft18–19 ft
Stated ceiling—10 ft
SpinMeasured with marked ballsMeasured
Ball data listed1512
Club data listed1216
Indoor / outdoorBothBoth
Ball markingMetallic stickers on the ball indoorsNot required
DisplayiOS or PCPC, iOS or Android
SubscriptionNot statedNot stated
Weight6.6 lb6.2 lb
Price seen$13,495$25,995

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

FlightScope X3C

Choose the FlightScope X3C if price leads the decision ($12,500 less).

Full reference →

Trackman 4

Choose the Trackman 4 if measured spin matters to you or you want club delivery data (path, face, loft).

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure