Comparison · Launch monitors

ProTee VX vs Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim

ProTee VX

ProTee VX

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 16–16 ft deep

$6,500

vs
ES Eagle Sim

Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 13.5–15.5 ft deep

$5,000

The difference that matters

The Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim fits a shorter room: about 13.5 ft minimum depth against 16 ft. The Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim lists more club data (6 parameters against 0). At the prices we observed, the Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim costs $1,500 less.

Side by side

SpecificationProTee VXErnest Sports ES Eagle Sim
TrackingCameraCamera
DetailHigh-speed cameras with infrared sensors and AI processingHigh-speed cameras
PlacementCeiling, in front of the ballCeiling, in front of the ball
Room depth (FOREference)16–16 ft13.5–15.5 ft
Stated ceiling9–10 ft9 ft
SpinMeasuredMeasured
Ball data listed111
Club data listed06
Indoor / outdoorIndoorIndoor
Ball markingNot required (any ball)Not required
DisplayWindows PC requiredPC or iOS
SubscriptionNone required; ProTee Labs included with no expiryNot stated
Weight18 lb13 lb
Price seen$6,500$5,000

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

ProTee VX

Choose the ProTee VX if you prefer its maker, seller or ecosystem — the published figures do not favour it.

Full reference →

Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim

Choose the Ernest Sports ES Eagle Sim if your room is under about 16 ft deep or you want club delivery data (path, face, loft).

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure