Comparison · Launch monitors

Uneekor EYE XO2 vs ProTee VX

EYE XO2

Uneekor EYE XO2

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 13.5–15.5 ft deep

$10,999

vs
ProTee VX

ProTee VX

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 16–16 ft deep

$6,500

The difference that matters

The Uneekor EYE XO2 fits a shorter room: about 13.5 ft minimum depth against 16 ft. The Uneekor EYE XO2 lists more club data (8 parameters against 0). The ProTee VX's listed plan is cheaper ($0/year against $199/year). At the prices we observed, the ProTee VX costs $4,499 less.

Side by side

SpecificationUneekor EYE XO2ProTee VX
TrackingCameraCamera
DetailThree high-speed cameras with Dimple OptixHigh-speed cameras with infrared sensors and AI processing
PlacementCeiling, in front of the ballCeiling, in front of the ball
Room depth (FOREference)13.5–15.5 ft16–16 ft
Stated ceiling—9–10 ft
SpinMeasuredMeasured
Ball data listed161
Club data listed80
Indoor / outdoorIndoorIndoor
Ball markingNot required (any ball)Not required (any ball)
DisplayWindows PC requiredWindows PC required
SubscriptionPlayer tier included; Pro $199/year adds third-party softwareNone required; ProTee Labs included with no expiry
Weight—18 lb
Price seen$10,999$6,500

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

Uneekor EYE XO2

Choose the Uneekor EYE XO2 if your room is under about 16 ft deep or you want club delivery data (path, face, loft).

Full reference →

ProTee VX

Choose the ProTee VX if running costs matter ($995 over five years) or price leads the decision ($4,499 less).

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure