Comparison · Launch monitors

FlightScope Mevo (original) vs Ernest Sports ESB1

Mevo (original)

FlightScope Mevo (original)

Radar · Behind the ball · 17–19 ft deep

$499

vs
ESB1

Ernest Sports ESB1

Radar · Behind the ball · 15–17 ft deep

$275

The difference that matters

The Ernest Sports ESB1 fits a shorter room: about 15 ft minimum depth against 17 ft. The Ernest Sports ESB1 measures spin directly, while the FlightScope Mevo (original) calculates it. Only the FlightScope Mevo (original) is listed for outdoor use as well as indoors. At the prices we observed, the Ernest Sports ESB1 costs $224 less.

Side by side

SpecificationFlightScope Mevo (original)Ernest Sports ESB1
TrackingRadarRadar
Detail3D Doppler radar3D Doppler radar
PlacementBehind the ballBehind the ball
Room depth (FOREference)17–19 ft15–17 ft
Stated ceiling——
SpinCalculatedMeasured
Ball data listed75
Club data listed12
Indoor / outdoorBothOutdoor
Ball markingNot requiredNot required
DisplayPhone or tabletiOS or Android
SubscriptionNot statedNot stated
Weight—1.5 lb
Price seen$499$275

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

FlightScope Mevo (original)

Choose the FlightScope Mevo (original) if you also want to use it at the range.

Full reference →

Ernest Sports ESB1

Choose the Ernest Sports ESB1 if your room is under about 17 ft deep or measured spin matters to you.

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure