Comparison · Launch monitors

FlightScope X3C vs Foresight Sports QuadMAX

X3C

FlightScope X3C

Radar + camera · Behind the ball · 17–19 ft deep

$13,495

vs
QuadMAX

Foresight Sports QuadMAX

Camera · Beside the ball · 13.5–15.5 ft deep

$19,999

The difference that matters

The Foresight Sports QuadMAX fits a shorter room: about 13.5 ft minimum depth against 17 ft. The Foresight Sports QuadMAX measures spin directly, while the FlightScope X3C needs marked balls for it. The FlightScope X3C lists more club data (12 parameters against 8). At the prices we observed, the FlightScope X3C costs $6,504 less.

Side by side

SpecificationFlightScope X3CForesight Sports QuadMAX
TrackingRadar + cameraCamera
DetailFusion Tracking (3D Doppler radar plus image processing)Quadrascopic high-speed camera system (four cameras)
PlacementBehind the ballBeside the ball
Room depth (FOREference)17–19 ft13.5–15.5 ft
Stated ceiling——
SpinMeasured with marked ballsMeasured
Ball data listed158
Club data listed128
Indoor / outdoorBothBoth
Ball markingMetallic stickers on the ball indoorsNot required
DisplayiOS or PCOn-unit display; PC or iOS
SubscriptionNot statedNot stated
Weight6.6 lb6.4 lb
Price seen$13,495$19,999

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

FlightScope X3C

Choose the FlightScope X3C if you want club delivery data (path, face, loft) or price leads the decision ($6,504 less).

Full reference →

Foresight Sports QuadMAX

Choose the Foresight Sports QuadMAX if your room is under about 17 ft deep or measured spin matters to you.

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure