Comparison · Launch monitors

Uneekor EYE XO vs VTrack

EYE XO

Uneekor EYE XO

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 13.5–15.5 ft deep

$6,499

vs
VTrack

VTrack

Camera · Ceiling, in front of the ball · 13.5–15.5 ft deep

$5,000

The difference that matters

The VTrack's listed plan is cheaper ($0/year against $199/year). At the prices we observed, the VTrack costs $1,499 less.

Side by side

SpecificationUneekor EYE XOVTrack
TrackingCameraCamera
DetailTwo high-speed cameras with Dimple OptixTwo high-speed cameras at 1,800 fps with infrared
PlacementCeiling, in front of the ballCeiling, in front of the ball
Room depth (FOREference)13.5–15.5 ft13.5–15.5 ft
Stated ceiling—8 ft 10 in minimum, 10 ft ideal
SpinMeasuredMeasured
Ball data listed1612
Club data listed89
Indoor / outdoorIndoorIndoor
Ball markingNot required (any ball)Not required (any ball)
DisplayWindows PC requiredWindows PC required
SubscriptionPlayer tier included; Pro $199/year adds third-party softwareNone for VTrack Range
Weight—24.6 lb
Price seen$6,499$5,000

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; room depth, distances and brightness are FOREference calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

Uneekor EYE XO

Choose the Uneekor EYE XO if you prefer its maker, seller or ecosystem — the published figures do not favour it.

Full reference →

VTrack

Choose the VTrack if running costs matter ($995 over five years) or price leads the decision ($1,499 less).

Full reference →

Before you buy either

FOREference compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure